Monday, September 5, 2016

From Consumers to Critics: The Media and "Worthy Victims"

Lesson’s target population:
In my 11th grade United States History classroom, I serve students with a wide range of learning preferences and needs. In our heterogeneous classroom, students learn best with choice, both in the texts they read and in the products they create. This unit allows students to choose news articles they feel comfortable analyzing. Students will also choose the form of the product they create for their final assessment.

Lesson Rationale:
            This lesson addresses how media (and historical sources) employ statistics and/or narrative storytelling to achieve the author’s purpose and construct a particular perspective. In the 11th grade U.S. history curriculum, students encounter many sources and can struggle with analyzing the reliability of a source. This lesson would be on Day 1 of a 3-day unit on media literacy. Day 2 focuses on the “frame” that news outlets use when telling a story. On Day 3, students create their own guide for their peers on how to “deconstruct” the media. In this unit, students will employ skills that will strengthen their “reading” of the media and all historical sources we encounter throughout the year.

Lesson Action
            Students will create a guide for their peers on how to “read” and “deconstruct” the media. See “Assessment” description below for more details. This action will be an invaluable resource for students throughout the year when we read multiple sources to understand the many perspectives that shape our understanding of American history.

Assessment
The final assessment for this 3-day unit is a guide that students will create for their peers on how to best “read” the media. In their guides, students must advise their classmates on how to consider the “frame” of a media story, as well as the questions we should ask of how statistics and narratives are presented in media. Students may choose the form for their guide from a list of options, including a one-page cartoon, a spoken word poem, a “recipe”-style set of instructions, or a short PSA video.
Not only will this assessment provide evidence of how students have understood the previous day’s lessons, it will also serve as a useful tool for all the sources we analyze throughout our year.



Lesson Title: Moving from Consumers to Critics (Day 1 of Critical Media Literacy Unit)
Grade Level: 11
Subject/Topic Area: U.S. History
Designed by: Julia Konrad
Time Frame: 1 class period of a 3-day unit

Learning Objective:
·      Whenever the news media presents information, it constructs a story told from its own perspective. To be critical consumers of media, we must deconstruct this perspective, examining the news for its use of statistics and narrative.

Common Core Standards:
·      CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.1
Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources, connecting insights gained from specific details to an understanding of the text as a whole.
·      CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.3
Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain.
·      CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.6
Evaluate authors' differing points of view on the same historical event or issue by assessing the authors' claims, reasoning, and evidence.

Materials:
·      Composition notebooks
·      Table sets of printed articles and a Chromebook at each table with Google Classroom and attached links set up.
      Handouts:
o  Day 1 Handouts and 3 articles about Shantel Davis (optional to use other news coverage of other people)

Big Understanding for the Year:
·      We examine history through multiple perspectives, and consider why some perspectives have been privileged or excluded in the past.

Essential Question for Unit:
·      How does the media decide who is a “worthy victim”?
·      How do news media outlets use statistics and narrative to construct their perspective of new information?

Do Now:
·      As a table, students fill out a 2-column T-Chart on two front-page headlines following the grand jury’s decision of Eric Garner’s death.
·      One student records, while others suggest responses:
o   Observations (What do you notice? What do you see?)
o   Inferences (What do you think these two images mean?)
·      Whole class debrief:
o   What is similar about these two newspapers’ response? What is different?
o   Why would these two newspapers tell different stories about the same decision?

Mini-Lesson (explicit instruction):
·      Whole class reading of “Deconstruct the News” handout introduction.
·      Quick review of vocab.

·      Whole class views Democracy Now clip, “HandcuffedWhile Dying.” Teacher models reading the very last paragraph (Charlene Carruthers' quote) of the transcript (provided to students), identifying “facts,” “statistics,” and “narratives.”


Independent Practice:
·      Teacher previews 3 articles on Shantel Davis and mentions varying levels of complexity. Students choose which they want to read in class. Students of the same media outlet group together to identify facts/statistics/narratives. Students then return to “home” tables to share out their analysis of their news article.
·      Step 1: Analyze the news article
o   Students choose 1 of 4 articles at their table. Using the yellow highlighter, they highlight the statistics in their chosen article. Using the orange highlighter, they highlight the narratives in their chosen article.
o   Each student table will have a different set of articles. Each set will center on one victim of police killing – Michael Brown, Delrawn Small, Shantel Davis, Kimani Gray, and Eric Garner.
§  Shantel Davis:
·      Step 2: Evaluate the news article
o   Students record 1 of the statistics on their handout and consider:
§  What was the source for that fact? Do you trust it? Why or why not?
o   Students record 1 of the narratives on their handout and consider:
§  Does that story remind you of any stereotypes about that person or group? Does that story make the person or group seem more likable or less? Explain.
··      Step 3: Critique the news article

o   Students rank the reliability and credibility of their chosen article, then present their critique to their tables.
o   As a table group, they prepare the closing activity (see below).

Closing:
·      In table groups, students imagine the following scenario:
o   A friend approaches you and says she saw someone post on Facebook/Twitter/Instagram that someone in her neighborhood has been shot by the police. She tells you she “wants to learn what really happened.” What advice would you give her? Write down 1-2 pieces of advice to share out to the whole class. This advice will be the brainstorm for their Media Literacy Guide.


Homework/Extension
·      Read the other 2 news articles and create a front-page for Shantel Davis’ story from the perspective of…
o   A key stakeholder (cop, student, family members)
o   Or from the perspective of a publisher (of your own invention or one of the sources you read)

Plan for action engagement:
·      On Day 3 of this unit, students will create their own guide for reading the media based on the previous two lessons. In their guides, students must advise their classmates on how to consider the “frame” of a media story, as well as the questions we should ask of how statistics and narratives are presented in media coverage (addressed on Day 2 of the unit). Students may use any of the following forms:
o   A cartoon
o   A spoken word poem
o   A “recipe”-style set of instructions
o   A PSA on Animoto


[Other potential articles for media analysis]
§  Michael Brown:
§  Kimani Gray
§  Eric Garner
§  Delrawn Small

Friday, September 2, 2016

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Was Bill Clinton’s Welfare Reform Act a success or failure? And what policies could help low income Americans going forward?

Nora Collins
Final; DN! Summer PD
August 30, 2016
Unit Title:  2016 Presidential Election Issues, it’s the second unit after “College and Career Choice”
Essential Question:  How can I be an educated and informed voter?
Grade Level: 12th grade (classes for 28-34 students)
Course:   Government & Economics
Time frame:  Two 50 minute lessons (although students would be given materials to read a week in advance to prepare)
Objective: SWBAT to support arguments with evidence; SWBAT demonstrate analysis of a varied set of sources; SWBAT to participate in a collaborative discussion.

Context:
This would be one of several discussions we would have on the issues in this year’s elections covering both domestic and foreign policy issues.  In other countries, wives and daughters of former presidents have often been the first female presidents or prime ministers.  This story may also unfold in the United States.  One major difference is the extraordinary extent to which Hillary Rodham Clinton was involved in her husband’s administration.  Because of this past involvement (and perhaps sexism), Ms. Clinton has had to address to address the legacy of her husband’s most significant policies: NAFTA, the 1994 Crime Bill, and Welfare Reform Act.  Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have admitted and apologized for the Crime Bill.  The Occupy Wall Street and its resurrection through the Bernie Sander campaign has brought greater attention to issues of wealth inequality.
Aim:  Was Bill Clinton’s Welfare Reform Act a success or failure?  And what policies could help low income Americans going forward?
Materials:
From Democracy Now! (both clip and transcripts)
From Newsweek:
From FiveThirtyEight.com:
From Salon:
From The Hill:
From The Atlantic:
From The Economist:
             7.  No Money, No Love
Procedure:
Day One:
  1. Students will be grouped in heterogeneous groups of four.
  2. In advance, students will have read and annotated the written materials
  3. Using laptops, groups can watch the clip
  4. Working together, students should write the main idea of each article on a post-it note.
  5. In their notes, students should make a t-chart with success, failure, and future ideas on either side.
  6. Working together, students can fill in this 3-way graphic organizer to prepare for your discussion.
  7. Students should write some answers to the two questions.  Students should also mark up the most compelling quantitative and anecdotal evidence from the sources.
  8. Although I will annotate the sources, some terms like “marginal tax rate” may need explaining.

Day Two:
  1. Groups will fill in the FRAME worksheets to prepare on two sources.  Now that they have processed  and recorded information from the readings, now they can begin to examine framing.
  2. Student can divide up the nine sources to make sure all are given the FRAME evaluation.
Day Three:
  1. Students will be divided up into two large groups to allow all students a chance to discuss.
  2. They will discuss
  1. The 1996 Welfare Reform Act
  2. How did you see differences in the coverage over the nine sources?
  3. Its legacy
  4. What they may know of welfare beyond the sources
  5. What actions should be taken going forward?
3.     In the wrap up, student should jot down ideas for their written statement,
4.     With a few extra days, student should write up a one page statement answering the discussion questions, with all arguments being supported by evidence.
Assessment:
1.     Discussion rubric
2.     Written statement
3.     FRAME sheets
4.   Annotations

Monday, August 29, 2016

Democracy Now! Summer 2016 Professional Development: Final

For your final: Choose a topic you would like to develop a lesson plan for related to your particular
teaching discipline. It could be a topic you already teach but want to design a new lesson plan for, or it could be a new topic you would like to integrate into your curriculum. Gather 3-5 articles, Democracy Now! Clips/transcripts, mains stream news clips and class activities that you think could relate to the topic.

Consider:
--Who is the lesson’s target population and how does it address this population’s specific needs?
--What is the lesson’s intention--what will it achieve?
--How will you assess that students “got it”?

Be prepared to present your lesson on your presentation day. You will have 45 minutes to present it to the group. Afterward you will get feedback from the group on your lesson. This feedback will be given to you in writing. For your final grade you need to take the feedback you received on your lesson into consideration, revise your lesson if necessary and upload it onto our class blog.

Know Your Media! Blog How-To:

We will help you to get your final lesson on the blog if you have trouble.

The final should have:
Unit Title:
Unit Essential Questions:
Grade Level:
Subject/Topic Areas(s):
Time Frame:
Objective - Students will understand/ be able to:
Materials:
Common Core Standards:
Media Literacy strategy
Democracy Now! Clip or transcript
Other media